Study of theρ(1710)at 8.0 and 18.5 GeV/c
Abstract
We have studied the reaction ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}p{\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\ensuremath{-}}(1710)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}p{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ at 8.0 and 18.5 GeV/c. Evidence is presented for the dominance of the ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}$ decay mode. An upper limit of 39% for $A \ensuremath{\pi}$ decay relative to all $4\ensuremath{\pi}$ decay modes is determined for the ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\ensuremath{-}}(1710)$. Assuming only $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\rho}$ and $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\pi}$ decay modes contribute, we find $\frac{[\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\rho}]}{[\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{all} 4\ensuremath{\pi}]}=(78\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}33)%$ and $\frac{[\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\pi}]}{[\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{all} 4\ensuremath{\pi}]}=(22\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}8)%$. If the $\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)$ is identical to the $g(1680)$, we find $\frac{(g\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2\ensuremath{\pi})}{(g\ensuremath{\rightarrow}4\ensuremath{\pi})}=0.35\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.11$. The mass and width of the $\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)$ determined from the ${(4\ensuremath{\pi})}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ mass spectrum are 1.687 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 0.020 GeV and ${0.169}_{\ensuremath{-}.048}^{+.070}$ GeV, respectively. The production cross section is determined as a function of energy and, if a function of the form $\ensuremath{\sigma}=A_{\mathrm{lab}}^{}{}_{}{}^{\ensuremath{-}n}$ is assumed, we find $n={1.4}_{\ensuremath{-}0.3}^{+0.5}$. The distribution of four-momentum transfers, ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}=t\ensuremath{-}{t}_{min}$, for $\ensuremath{\rho}(1710)$ production is characterized by a two-slope distribution with ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{1}\ensuremath{\approx}9.6$ ${(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}/\mathit{c})}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$ for ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.3$ ${(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}/\mathit{c})}^{2}$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{2}\ensuremath{\approx}2.1$ ${(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}/\mathit{c})}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$ for ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.3$ ${(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}/\mathit{c})}^{2}$.
Related Papers
- IDENTIFIKASI MODE RUSAK JAMAK (MULTI-FAULTS) BANTALAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS ENVELOPE PADA TURBIN ANGIN Horizontal Axis(2018)
- EVALUASI PERLAKUAN AKUNTANSI HARGA POKOK PRODUK RUSAK PADA PT. MULIAPRIMA REPLICATAMA SEMARANG(2000)
- ANALISIS PERLAKUAN AKUNTANSI PRODUK RUSAK PADA PT. AJINOMOTO INDONESIA MOJOKERTO FACTORY(2017)
- Perbedaan Kinerja Karyawan Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan Uraian Pekerjaan(2001)