Cryptographic design vulnerabilities
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 1998 papers
Abstract
Strong cryptography is very powerful when it is done right, but it is not a panacea. Focusing on cryptographic algorithms while ignoring other aspects of security is like defending your house not by building a fence around it, but by putting an immense stake in the ground and hoping that your adversary runs right into it. Counterpane Systems has spent years designing, analyzing, and breaking cryptographic systems. While they do research on published algorithms and protocols, most of their work examines actual products. They've designed and analyzed systems that protect privacy, ensure confidentiality, provide fairness, and facilitate commerce. They've worked with software, stand-alone hardware, and everything in between. They've broken their share of algorithms, but they can almost always find attacks that bypass the algorithms altogether. Counterpane Systems don't have to try every possible key or even find flaws in the algorithms. They exploit errors in design, errors in implementation, and errors in installation. Sometimes they invent a new trick to break a system, but most of the time they exploit the same old mistakes that designers make over and over again. The article conveys some of the lessons this company has learned.
Related Papers
- Algebra model and security analysis for cryptographic protocols(2004)
- → A Study on Fine-Grained Security Properties of Cryptographic Protocols for Formal Analysis Method with Reasoning(2018)2 cited
- Formal Model and Security Analysis for Cryptographic Protocols in the Distributed Network Environment(2002)
- → Primitive Constituent Elements of Cryptographic Protocols(2018)
- → A Simple and Efficient Approach to Verifying Cryptographic Protocols(2000)