Software component certification
Computer2001Vol. 34(9), pp. 30–36
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2001 papers
Abstract
Although the stringent requirements of some critical applications may require independent certification, the authors see software developer self-certification as a viable alternative in many other cases. They accept that using software certification laboratories (SCLs) may work well for certain software distribution models, but they cannot be applied to all types of software development. The approach has several drawbacks. For example, an SCL may work well for larger software houses that ship mass-marketed software applications to the public, but it is less satisfactory for smaller developers who make reusable components or safety-critical software or for developers who belong to the freeware community.
Related Papers
- Good, Bad, and Beautiful Software - In Search of Green Software Quality Factors(2011)
- → Software maintenance improvement in small software companies: Reflections on experiences(2021)10 cited
- → Towards The Adoption of Modern Software Development Approach: Component Based Software Engineering(2016)2 cited
- → Software process improvement by example (SPIE)(2002)2 cited
- The Prominent Study on Software Re-Engineering for Software Development(2014)