A Visual Vocabulary for Flower Classification
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2006 papers
Abstract
We investigate to what extent ‘bag of visual words’ models can be used to distinguish categories which have significant visual similarity. To this end we develop and optimize a nearest neighbour classifier architecture, which is evaluated on a very challenging database of flower images. The flower categories are chosen to be indistinguishable on colour alone (for example), and have considerable variation in shape, scale, and viewpoint. We demonstrate that by developing a visual vocabulary that explicitly represents the various aspects (colour, shape, and texture) that distinguish one flower from another, we can overcome the ambiguities that exist between flower categories. The novelty lies in the vocabulary used for each aspect, and how these vocabularies are combined into a final classifier. The various stages of the classifier (vocabulary selection and combination) are each optimized on a validation set. Results are presented on a dataset of 1360 images consisting of 17 flower species. It is shown that excellent performance can be achieved, far surpassing standard baseline algorithms using (for example) colour cues alone.
Related Papers
- → Propositions about novelty(2009)88 cited
- → Propositions about novelty(2016)3 cited
- Discussion of Personnel Training of Novelty in Medical Colleges(2012)
- A tentative talk on the similarities and differences on "novelty" between science and technology checking novelty and patent novelty search(2010)
- → Measuring Difficulty of Novelty Reaction(2022)