0 citations0 references

Comparison between Support Vector Machine and Random Forest for Audio Classification

2021 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Information Technology (ICECIT)2021pp. 1–4

Citations Over TimeTop 12% of 2021 papers

Md. Rifat Ansari, Sadia Alam Tumpa, Jannat Ara Ferdouse Raya, Mohammad N. Murshed

Abstract

Machine learning techniques have been in use to identify voice samples. We consider Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) and compare their performance in detecting specific audio samples from a set of samples pertaining to many subjects. In particular, we propose an algorithm that can deal with multiple features for multiple audio samples from more than one subject. This work discusses the application and other implementation issues. As a demonstration, SVM and RF models are trained using voice samples from two subjects. We found out that SVM is 100% accurate and Random Forest is 70% accurate for subject 1, whereas SVM is 60% accurate and Random Forest is 90% accurate for subject 2. Our results show that the performance of SVM and RF varies from subject to subject.

Related Papers

→ Guided Random Forest in the RRF Package(2013)61 cited
On Subject And Subject′ s Construction(2005)
Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
→ Prediction and Characteristic Exploration of Military Specialized High School Trainee Selection Using Machine Learning(2023)
→ Non-Substantial Individuals In Aristotle’S Categories(2004)