International Insights on AI Risk: Comparative Analysis of International Organizations

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2024 papers

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is an important technology in our lives by facilitating solutions to daily life and business life. States have started to actively use AI in their processes. With the rapid development and popularity of artificial intelligence, there are reflections of many risk groups. In order to manage these risks, studies on risk mitigation frameworks are being carried out by various international organizations. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of risk and awareness studies conducted by OECD, EU, UN, UNESCO, IEEE and ISO. It aims to provide insights into the debate on AI risks from an international perspective. For each document, key objectives, principles, implementation mechanisms and scopes are examined. Key focus areas are analyzed by examining official and policy documents. Our findings reveal both similarities and differences. While a common finding across all studies is the emphasis on fundamental rights and human values, there are differences in methodologies. OECD and EU adopt a more regulatory and guiding stance. IEEE and ISO continue their efforts to create global standards through standardization. While the UN focuses on AI within the scope of sustainability goals, UNESCO offers recommendations for global ethics. The paper helps to gain insights into the debate on AI risks from an international perspective

Related Papers

• → ESKVS: efficient and secure approach for keyframes-based video summarization framework(2024)9 cited
• Study and Two Types of Typical Usage of DataGrid Web Server Control(2005)
• Using DataGrid Control to Realize DataBase of Querying in VB6.0(2000)
• Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
• → ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ(2024)