Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study
Addiction2021Vol. 116(9), pp. 2463–2475
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2021 papers
Jesús Castro‐Calvo, Daniel L. King, Dan J. Stein, Matthias Brand, Lior Carmi, Samuel R. Chamberlain, Zsolt Demetrovics, Naomi Fineberg, Hans‐Jürgen Rumpf, Murat Yücel, Sophia Achab, Atul Ambekar, Norharlina Bahar, Alex Blaszczynski, Henrietta Bowden‐Jones, Xavier Carbonell, Elda M. L. Chan, Chih‐Hung Ko, Philippe de Timary, Magali Dufour, Marie Grall‐Bronnec, Hae Kook Lee, Susumu Higuchi, Susana Jiménez‐Múrcia, Orsolya Király, Daria J. Kuss, Jiang Long, Astrid Müller, Stefano Pallanti, Marc N. Potenza, Afarin Rahimi‐Movaghar, John B. Saunders, Adriano Schimmenti, Seung‐Yup Lee, Kristiana Siste, Daniel Tornaim Spritzer, Vladan Starčević, Aviv Weinstein, Klaus Wölfling, Joël Billieux
Abstract
This Delphi survey provides a foundation for identifying the most diagnostically valid and clinically useful criteria for GD. There was expert agreement that some DSM-5 criteria were not clinically relevant and may pathologize non-problematic patterns of gaming, whereas ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines are likely to diagnose GD adequately and avoid pathologizing.
Related Papers
- → Directions in Delphi developments: Dissertations and their quality(1986)82 cited
- → An analysis of prior delphi applications and some observations on its future applicability(1977)35 cited
- → Applications of the Delphi method in China(1990)12 cited
- → A Delphi Study of Regional Industrial Land-Use(1977)4 cited
- → Delphi Rounds 1 to 3 - Developing a Core Outcome Set for a Congenital Abnormalities Surveillance Programme in Rwanda – a Delphi consensus study(2019)2 cited