A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low‐cost mobile application versus higher‐cost handheld 3D scanner for digital ear prosthetics
ANZ Journal of Surgery2024Vol. 95(4), pp. 719–726
Citations Over Time
Rhea Darbari Kaul, Cindy Duong, Jolande Ma, Sepidar Sayyar, Gordon G. Wallace, Masako Dunn, Kai Cheng, Sophie Fleming, Sarah Whereat, Jonathan R. Clark, Payal Mukherjee
Abstract
Mobile iPhone applications such as EM3D are a viable alternative to 3D handheld scanners such as EinScan. This study demonstrates reliable results in accuracy, and improved results in time, cost and operational feasibility.
Related Papers
- → Workflow Reuse in Practice: A Study of Neuroimaging Pipeline Users(2014)15 cited
- Workflow Analysis using Graph Kernels.(2010)
- → Plausibility of Image Reconstruction Using a Proposed Flexible and Portable CT Scanner(2012)
- → A COST EFFECTIVE MULTI-SPECTRAL SCANNER FOR NATURAL GAS DETECTION(2004)
- → A Cost Effective Multi-Spectral Scanner for Natural Gas Detection(2005)