Live birth and miscarriage rate following intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica2019Vol. 99(1), pp. 24–33
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2019 papers
Montserrat Durán-Retamal, Guy Morris, Chiara Achilli, Matthew Gaunt, Efstathios Theodorou, Wael Saab, Paul Serhal, Srividya Seshadri
Abstract
Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing IMSI to ICSI has not shown any difference in live birth rate and miscarriage rate. Meta-analysis of observational studies, which must be interpreted with caution, revealed an increased live birth rate and decreased miscarriage rate with IMSI vs ICSI.
Related Papers
- → Effects of metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with gonadotrophins for in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials(2012)106 cited
- → Growth hormone cotreatment for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2020)55 cited
- → Blastocyst Transfer Ameliorates Live Birth Rate Compared with Cleavage-Stage Embryos Transfer in FreshIn VitroFertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: Reviews and Meta-Analysis(2014)50 cited
- → The effect of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(2020)46 cited
- → The role of diagnostic hysteroscopy before the first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle(2012)22 cited