Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica2020Vol. 99(10), pp. 1278–1289
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2020 papers
Maddalena Morlando, Danilo Buca, Ilan E. Timor‐Tritsch, Giuseppe Calì, José M. Palacios‐Jaraquemada, Ana Monteagudo, Asma Khalil, Carmen Cennamo, Viviana La Manna, Marco Liberati, Alice D’Amico, Luigi Nappi, Nicola Colacurci, F. D’Antonio
Abstract
Women with a prior CSP are at high risk of recurrence, miscarriage, preterm birth and placenta accreta spectrum. There is still insufficient evidence to elucidate whether the type of management adopted (surgical vs non-surgical) can impact reproductive outcome after CSP. Further large, prospective studies sharing an objective protocol of prenatal management and long-term follow up are needed to establish the optimal management of CSP and to elucidate whether it may affect its risk of recurrence and pregnancy outcome in subsequent gestations.
Related Papers
- → Diagnosis and Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Placenta Accreta Spectrum(2020)15 cited
- → The outcome of pregnancies in 182 women with threatened miscarriage(2003)52 cited
- → Miscarriage risk from amniocentesis performed for abnormal maternal serum screening(2007)37 cited
- → 113: Placenta accreta in a previous pregnancy and its significance on subsequent births(2012)
- Ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta(2012)