Modes of ontogenetic allometric shifts in crocodylian vertebrae
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers
Abstract
During postnatal ontogeny of vertebrates, allometric trends in certain morphological units or dimensions can shift drastically among isometry, positive allometry, and negative allometry. However, detailed patterns of allometric transitions in certain timings have not been explored well. Identifying the presence and nature of allometric shifts is essential for understanding the patterns of changes in relative size and shape and the proximal factors that are controlling these changes mechanistically. Allometric trends in 10 selected vertebrae (cervical 2–caudal 2) from hatchlings to very mature individuals of Alligator mississippiensis (Archosauria, Crocodylia) are reported in the present study. Allometric coefficients in 12 vertebral dimensions are calculated and compared relative to total body length, including centrum, neural spine, transverse process, zygapophysis, and neural pedicle. During the postnatal growth, positive allometry is the most common type of relative change (10 of the 12 dimensions), although the diameter of the neural canal shows a negative allometric trend. However, when using spurious breaks (i.e. allometric trends subdivided into growth stages using certain growth events, and key body sizes and/or ages), vertebral parts exhibit various pathways of allometric shifts. Based on allometric trends in three spurious breaks, separated by the end of endochondral ossification (body length: approximnately 0.9 m), sexual maturity (1.8 m), and the stoppage of body size increase (2.8 m), six types of ontogenetic allometric shifts are established. Allometric shifts exhibit a wide range from positive allometry restricted only in the early postnatal stage (Type I) to life-long positive allometry (Type VI). This model of ontogenetic allometric shifts is then applied to interpret potential mechanisms (causes) of allometric changes, such as (1) growth itself (when allometric trend gradually decreases to isometric or negative allometric change: Type II–IV allometric shift); (2) developmental constraint (when positive allometry is limited only in the early growth stage: Type I allometric shift); and (3) functional or biomechanical drive (when positive allometry continues throughout ontogeny: Type VI allometric shift).
Related Papers
- → Evolution of extreme ontogenetic allometric diversity and heterochrony in pythons, a clade of giant and dwarf snakes(2017)85 cited
- → Ontogenetic and static allometry in the human face: Contrasting Khoisan and Inuit(2015)47 cited
- → Allometric equations for pioneer tree species and estimation of the aboveground biomass of a tropical secondary forest in East Kalimantan(2004)41 cited
- → Development of Allometric Equation for Estimating Aboveground Biomass in Ampang Forest Reserve,Malaysia(2017)4 cited
- → TITANOTHERE ALLOMETRY, HETEROCHRONY, AND BIOMECHANICS: REVISING AN EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIC(1985)19 cited