Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second‐level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study
British Journal of Dermatology2014Vol. 171(5), pp. 1044–1051
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2014 papers
Abstract
Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination to dermatoscopy proved to be highly accurate in diagnosis and reduced the number of unnecessary excisions. Improved accuracy, considering that RCM enabled the detection of the six melanomas (2%) in the group of 308 lesions eligible for follow-up, also minimizes the risk of referring a melanoma to digital dermatoscopy monitoring, and potentially losing the patient to follow-up.
Related Papers
- → Accuracy of dermatoscopy for the diagnosis of nonpigmented cancers of the skin(2017)119 cited
- → Dermatoscopy: usefulness in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous pigmentary lesions(1994)66 cited
- → Dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: a new semiology for the dermatologist(2000)51 cited
- → Dermatoscopy: Facts and controversies(2010)13 cited
- → The Dermatoscopic ABCD Rule Does Not Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Malignant Melanoma(1999)36 cited