Mapping public health responses with attitude networks: the emergence of opinion‐based groups in the UK’s early COVID‐19 response phase

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2020 papers

Abstract

Partisan patterns of compliance with public health measures are a feature of early COVID-19 responses. In many cases, these differences in behaviour relate to pre-existing group identities. However, in times of rapid societal change, novel opinion-based groups can emerge and provide a new basis for partisan identification and divergent collective behaviour. Here, we use network methods to map the emergence of opposing opinion-based groups and assess their implications for public health behaviour. In a longitudinal study, we tracked public health attitudes and self-reported behaviour in a sample of UK participants over four time points. Network visualisation reveal a rift in attitudinal alignment over time and the genesis of two distinct groups characterised by trust, or distrust, in science (Study 1a; N = 253). These groups also diverge in public health behaviour. In a brief follow-up study (N = 206), we find that this opinion polarization partially reflects underlying societal divides. We discuss implications for opinion-based group research and public health campaigns.

Related Papers

• → Distrust in the Balance: The Emergence and Development of Intergroup Distrust in a Court of Law(2015)94 cited
• → Trust is heritable, whereas distrust is not(2017)62 cited
• What Does the Brain Tell Us About Trust and Distrust? Evidence from a Functional Neuroimaging Study(2010)
• → Comparing Antecedents of Chinese Consumers’ Trust and Distrust(2021)7 cited
• → Distrust and mistrust(2021)