Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers
British Journal of Pharmacology2018Vol. 175(7), pp. 987–993
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2018 papers
Michael J. Curtis, S P H Alexander, Giuseppe Cirino, James R. Docherty, Christopher H. George, Mark A. Giembycz, Daniël Hoyer, Paul A. Insel, Angelo A. Izzo, Yong Ji, David J. MacEwan, Christopher G. Sobey, S. Clare Stanford, Mauro Martins Teixeira, Susan Wonnacott, Amrita Ahluwalia
Abstract
This article updates the guidance published in 2015 for authors submitting papers to British Journal of Pharmacology (Curtis et al., 2015) and is intended to provide the rubric for peer review. Thus, it is directed towards authors, reviewers and editors. Explanations for many of the requirements were outlined previously and are not restated here. The new guidelines are intended to replace those published previously. The guidelines have been simplified for ease of understanding by authors, to make it more straightforward for peer reviewers to check compliance and to facilitate the curation of the journal's efforts to improve standards.
Related Papers
- → A rubric for pre-service teachers to evaluate meaningful physical education(2024)4 cited
- → A study on the design of growth-based evaluation rubric(2023)1 cited
- → Developing and Using Rubrics in Occupational Therapy(2008)
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ(2024)