Developing Thoughts About What Might Have Been
Child Development Perspectives2014Vol. 8(3), pp. 175–179
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2014 papers
Abstract
Abstract Recent research has changed how developmental psychologists understand counterfactual thinking or thoughts of what might have been. Evidence suggests that counterfactual thinking develops over an extended period into at least middle childhood, depends on domain-general processes including executive function and language, and dissociates from counterfactual emotions such as regret. In this article, we review the developmental evidence that forms a critical but often-overlooked complement to the cognitive, social, and neuroscience literatures. We also highlight topics for further research, including spontaneous counterfactual thinking and counterfactual thinking in clinical settings.
Related Papers
- → What's So Different about a Counterfactual?(2000)159 cited
- → It could have been better: The effects of counterfactual communication on impression formation(2009)15 cited
- → What we imagine versus how we imagine, and a problem for explaining counterfactual thoughts with causal ones(2007)2 cited
- → Counterpossibles in Mathematical Practice: The Case of Spoof Perfect Numbers(2021)1 cited
- → Counterfactuals and Abduction(2021)