A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery
Colorectal Disease2013Vol. 15(10), pp. e548–60
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2013 papers
Robert N. Whistance, Rachael O. Forsythe, Angus McNair, Sara Brookes, Kerry Avery, A. M. Pullyblank, P. A. Sylvester, David Jayne, J. E. Jones, Julia Brown, Mark Coleman, Susan Dutton, R. Hackett, Richard Huxtable, Robin H. Kennedy, Dion Morton, Alfred Oliver, Ann Russell, Mark Thomas, Jane Blazeby, The CONSENSUS‐CRC (Core Outcomes and iNformation SEts iN SUrgical Studies – ColoRectal Cancer) working group
Abstract
Outcome reporting in CRC surgery lacks consistency and method. Improved standards of outcome measurement are recommended to permit data synthesis and transparent cross-study comparisons.
Related Papers
- → Outcome effect, controllability and performance evaluation of managers: some field evidence from multi-outlet businesses(2000)72 cited
- → CREDIBILITY AND RENEGOTIATION OF OUTCOME FUNCTIONS IN IMPLEMENTATION(1996)7 cited
- → Effect of Intention on Outcome Bias in Decision Making—Implications for Safety Management(2015)3 cited
- Evaluation of Follow-up Impact of the Honoured Outcome under the Quasi-Purchase System of Research Outcome(2008)
- → 3rd Educational Colorectal Meeting “Emergencies in Colorectal Surgery”(2011)