A Single Counterexample Leads to Moral Belief Revision
Citations Over TimeTop 15% of 2015 papers
Abstract
What kind of evidence will lead people to revise their moral beliefs? Moral beliefs are often strongly held convictions, and existing research has shown that morality is rooted in emotion and socialization rather than deliberative reasoning. In addition, more general issues-such as confirmation bias-further impede coherent belief revision. Here, we explored a unique means for inducing belief revision. In two experiments, participants considered a moral dilemma in which an overwhelming majority of people judged that it was inappropriate to take action to maximize utility. Their judgments contradicted a utilitarian principle they otherwise strongly endorsed. Exposure to this scenario led participants to revise their belief in the utilitarian principle, and this revision persisted over several hours. This method provides a new avenue for inducing belief revision.
Related Papers
- → Moral Decision-making in Real Life: Factors affecting moral orientation and behaviour justification(2002)54 cited
- → Human morality is based on an early-emerging moral core(2022)7 cited
- → Teaching about Science and Society: Moral Judgment and the Prisoner's Dilemma(1977)5 cited
- How to Understand the Moral Dilemma(2011)
- The moral and anti - moral dilemmas(2013)