New measures for assessing model equilibrium and prediction mismatch in species distribution models

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2013 papers

Abstract

Abstract Models based on species distributions are widely used and serve important purposes in ecology, biogeography and conservation. Their continuous predictions of environmental suitability are commonly converted into a binary classification of predicted (or potential) presences and absences, whose accuracy is then evaluated through a number of measures that have been the subject of recent reviews. We propose four additional measures that analyse observation‐prediction mismatch from a different angle – namely, from the perspective of the predicted rather than the observed area – and add to the existing toolset of model evaluation methods. We explain how these measures can complete the view provided by the existing measures, allowing further insights into distribution model predictions. We also describe how they can be particularly useful when using models to forecast the spread of diseases or of invasive species and to predict modifications in species’ distributions under climate and land‐use change.

Related Papers

• → Where are the wild things? Why we need better data on species distribution(2013)62 cited
• → Predicting the occurrence of rare Brazilian birds with species distribution models(2010)57 cited
• → Integrating intraspecific differentiation in species distribution models: Consequences on projections of current and future climatically suitable areas of species(2019)49 cited
• → Climate based model in determining the distribution pattern of Cecropia peltata L across global landscape(2021)2 cited
• → SmarteR Approach for the Mapping of Invasive Plant Species(2022)