How species richness and total abundance constrain the distribution of abundance
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2013 papers
Abstract
The species abundance distribution (SAD) is one of the most intensively studied distributions in ecology and its hollow-curve shape is one of ecology's most general patterns. We examine the SAD in the context of all possible forms having the same richness (S) and total abundance (N), i.e. the feasible set. We find that feasible sets are dominated by similarly shaped hollow curves, most of which are highly correlated with empirical SADs (most R(2) values > 75%), revealing a strong influence of N and S on the form of the SAD and an a priori explanation for the ubiquitous hollow curve. Empirical SADs are often more hollow and less variable than the majority of the feasible set, revealing exceptional unevenness and relatively low natural variability among ecological communities. We discuss the importance of the feasible set in understanding how general constraints determine observable variation and influence the forms of predicted and empirical patterns.
Related Papers
- → How good are carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as indicators of invertebrate abundance and order richness?(2012)58 cited
- → Urbanization is not associated with increased abundance or decreased richness of terrestrial animals - dissecting the literature through meta-analysis(2016)59 cited
- → Abundance and species richness in natural aquatic microcosms: a test and refinement of the Niche-Limitation Hypothesis(2002)14 cited
- → Long-term species richness-abundance dynamics in relation to species departures and arrivals in wintering urban bird assemblages(2019)5 cited
- Bird species richness and abundance: The effects of structural attributes, habitat complexity and tree diameter(2018)