Talking to the people that really matter about their participation in pandemic clinical research: A qualitative study in four European countries
Health Expectations2017Vol. 21(1), pp. 387–395
Citations Over TimeTop 18% of 2017 papers
Nina Gobat, Micaela Gal, Christopher Butler, Steve Webb, Nick Francis, Helen Stanton, Sibyl Anthierens, Hilde Bastiaens, Maciek Godycki-Ćwirko, Anna Kowalczyk, Mariona Pons‐Vigués, Enriqueta Pujol‐Ribera, Anna Berenguera, Angela Watkins, Prasanth Sukumar, Ronnie Moore, Kerenza Hood, Alistair Nichol
Abstract
This bottom-up approach to ascertaining public views on pandemic clinical research has identified support for more proportionate research protection procedures for publically funded, low-risk studies.
Related Papers
- → Chilblain‐like lesions after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine: a case report suggesting that ‘COVID toes’ are due to the immune reaction to SARS‐CoV‐2(2021)26 cited
- → And now for something completely different: from 2019-nCoV and COVID-19 to 2020-nMan(2020)27 cited
- → ОПЫТ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ СЕРОПРЕВАЛЕНТНОСТИ К ВИРУСУ SARS-CoV-2 НАСЕЛЕНИЯ ИРКУТСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ В ПЕРИОД ВСПЫШКИ COVID-19(2020)2 cited
- → Особенности сахароснижающей фармакотерапии у пациентов с SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)(2021)