Initial Independent Outcomes from Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Multicenter FIRM Registry
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology2014Vol. 25(9), pp. 921–929
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2014 papers
John M. Miller, Robert Kowal, Vijay Swarup, James P. Daubert, Emile G. Daoud, John Day, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, John D. Hummel, Tina Baykaner, David E. Krummen, Sanjiv M. Narayan, Vivek Y. Reddy, Kalyanam Shivkumar, Jonathan S. Steinberg, Kevin R. Wheelan
Abstract
Elimination of patient-specific AF rotors/focal sources produced freedom-from-AF of ≈80% at 1 year at centers new to FIRM. FIRM-guided ablation has a rapid learning curve, yielding similar results to original FIRM reports in each center's first cases.
Related Papers
- → Atrial fibrillation ablation patients have long-term stroke rates similar to patients without atrial fibrillation regardless of CHADS2 score(2013)144 cited
- → Very-high-power Short-duration Ablation versus Conventional Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis(2023)12 cited
- → Adjunct ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation-beyond pulmonary vein isolation.(2015)11 cited
- → Differences in success of repeat ablation procedure for recurrent atrial fibrillation after two different ablation strategies: Results from a prospective randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus circumferential pulmonary vein ablation(2005)
- → No Difference in Success of Repeat Catheter Ablation for Patients with Recurrent Persistent AF in the Presence of PV Reconnection vs Enduring Pulmonary Vein Isolation(2019)