Endo‐epicardial ablation vs endocardial ablation for the management of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology2020Vol. 31(8), pp. 2022–2031
Citations Over TimeTop 11% of 2020 papers
Jorge Romero, Kavisha Patel, David Briceño, Isabella Alviz, Mohamed Gabr, Juan Carlos Díaz, Chintan Trivedi, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Domenico G. Della Rocca, Amin Al‐Ahmad, Ruike Yang, Saúl Ríos, Luis Cerna, Xianfeng Du, Nicola Tarantino, Xiaodong Zhang, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Andrea Natale, Luigi Di Biase
Abstract
Our findings suggest that in patients with ARVC, endo-epicardial VT ablation is associated with a significant reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone, without a significant difference in all-cause mortality or acute procedural complications.
Related Papers
- → Substrate-based approaches in ventricular tachycardia ablation(2022)16 cited
- → Imaging-guided Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation(2013)27 cited
- → Perpendicular catheter orientation during papillary muscle ablation results in larger, deeper lesions(2022)8 cited
- → Applying ablation index to catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: The search for the more perfect ablation lesion continues(2024)1 cited
- → Anatomically Guided Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation(2008)2 cited