Addressing unwarranted clinical variation: A rapid review of current evidence
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice2018Vol. 25(1), pp. 53–65
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2018 papers
Abstract
Wennberg's classification framework is commonly cited in relation to classifying variation, but no single approach is agreed upon to systematically explore and address UCV. The instances of UCV that warrant investigation and action are largely determined at a systems level currently, and stakeholder engagement in this process is limited. Lack of consensus on an evidence-based definition for UCV remains a substantial barrier to progress in this field.
Related Papers
- → Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies(2016)895 cited
- → Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits(2013)777 cited
- → Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews(2017)501 cited
- → Classroom understanding: An expanded notion of teacher clarity(1997)61 cited
- → Review of: "The Success of Ecological Leadership for the Church Expectations"(2023)