The influence of the renewal or the single application of the peroxide gel on the efficacy and tooth sensitivity outcomes of in‐office bleaching—A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry2021Vol. 34(3), pp. 490–502
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers
Matheus Kury, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Bruna de Almeida Resende, Mayara Zaghi Dal Picolo, Carolina Bosso André, Vanessa Cavalli
Abstract
The renewal of bleaching gel during the in-office appointment may not be necessary. However, there is at least a low certainty of evidence. Because of this, further randomized clinical trials with appropriate methodology on this topic are encouraged.
Related Papers
- → A double-blind randomized clinical trial of two carbamide peroxide tooth bleaching agents: 2-year follow-up(2010)105 cited
- → Comparison of Two At-home Whitening Products of Similar Peroxide Concentration and Different Delivery Methods(2012)64 cited
- → A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of 10 Percent Versus 16 Percent Carbamide Peroxide Tooth-Bleaching Agents(2009)45 cited
- Comparative clinical investigation of the tooth whitening efficacy of two tooth whitening gels.(2003)
- Evaluation of the effect of Opalescence PF in-home tooth whitening emboitement on discolored tooth(2011)