Personality Predicts Obedience in a Milgram Paradigm

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2014 papers

Abstract

This study investigates how obedience in a Milgram-like experiment is predicted by interindividual differences. Participants were 35 males and 31 females aged 26-54 from the general population who were contacted by phone 8 months after their participation in a study transposing Milgram's obedience paradigm to the context of a fake television game show. Interviews were presented as opinion polls with no stated ties to the earlier experiment. Personality was assessed by the Big Five Mini-Markers questionnaire (Saucier, 1994). Political orientation and social activism were also measured. Results confirmed hypotheses that Conscientiousness and Agreeableness would be associated with willingness to administer higher-intensity electric shocks to a victim. Political orientation and social activism were also related to obedience. Our results provide empirical evidence suggesting that individual differences in personality and political variables matter in the explanation of obedience to authority.

Related Papers

• → The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority1(1999)268 cited
• → A Cross‐Cultural Comparison of Studies of Obedience Using the Milgram Paradigm: A Review(2012)104 cited
• → Obedience, Self‐Control, and the Voice of Culture(2014)43 cited
• → Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology's conception of ‘obedience’(2018)42 cited
• → When is “Obedience” Obedience? Conceptual and Historical Commentary(1995)57 cited