Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E-37 Trial
Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface2015Vol. 19(2), pp. 188–195
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers
Robert S. Fisher, Pegah Afra, Mícheál P. Macken, Daniela Minecan, Anto Bagić, Selim R. Benbadis, Sandra L. Helmers, Saurabh R. Sinha, Jeremy D. Slater, David M. Treiman, Jason Begnaud, Pradheep Raman, Bita Najimipour
Abstract
The Model 106 performed as intended in the study population, was well tolerated and associated with clinical improvement from baseline. The study design did not allow determination of which factors were responsible for improvements.
Related Papers
- → Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: A review of central mechanisms(2012)181 cited
- → Development and characterization of a chronic implant mouse model for vagus nerve stimulation(2021)46 cited
- → Vagus nerve stimulation in clinical practice(2016)35 cited
- → A new choice for the treatment of epilepsy: Electrical auricula-vagus-stimulation(2011)14 cited
- → O038 / #883 LARYNGEAL MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS: CLINICAL BENEFIT IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION USING A SYNCHRONIZED PROGRAMMABLE IMPLANT(2022)