The ‘right’ place to care for older people: home or institution?
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2013 papers
Abstract
In 2008, the Minister of Health for Iceland issued a new regulation intended to govern assessment practices related to placement in nursing homes. One of the aims of the regulation was to ensure that those with the most severe need would have priority. This would be achieved, in part, by requiring older people to exhaust all available community-based service options before an assessment for placement would even take place. The new regulation was received with some hostility and criticism on the part of older people and their relatives, who described the changed expectations as 'abandonment' by the authorities. We present our analysis of these changes by examining how older people and families are reconfigured through the new policy and argue that this 'new' practice of de-institutionalization is underpinned by a shifting epistemic and normative context that is working to create a new identity and a different way of life in advanced age in Iceland. The analysis has implications for other nations as well, as much policy related to older people is broadly informed by this idea that 'home is best', that is, the idea that more care simply needs to happen outside of institutional settings.
Related Papers
- → About Institutions, Mainly, but not Exclusively, Political(2009)20 cited
- → Paradoxicality of Institution, De-Institutionalization and the Counter-Institutional: A Case Study in Classical Chinese Chan Buddhist Thought(2012)3 cited
- → The method of normative reconstruction as a tool for social criticism(2018)3 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)