The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical elevation gradient: a whole carbon budget perspective
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Abstract
Why do forest productivity and biomass decline with elevation? To address this question, research to date generally has focused on correlative approaches describing changes in woody growth and biomass with elevation. We present a novel, mechanistic approach to this question by quantifying the autotrophic carbon budget in 16 forest plots along a 3300 m elevation transect in Peru. Low growth rates at high elevations appear primarily driven by low gross primary productivity (GPP), with little shift in either carbon use efficiency (CUE) or allocation of net primary productivity (NPP) between wood, fine roots and canopy. The lack of trend in CUE implies that the proportion of photosynthate allocated to autotrophic respiration is not sensitive to temperature. Rather than a gradual linear decline in productivity, there is some limited but nonconclusive evidence of a sharp transition in NPP between submontane and montane forests, which may be caused by cloud immersion effects within the cloud forest zone. Leaf-level photosynthetic parameters do not decline with elevation, implying that nutrient limitation does not restrict photosynthesis at high elevations. Our data demonstrate the potential of whole carbon budget perspectives to provide a deeper understanding of controls on ecosystem functioning and carbon cycling.
Related Papers
- → A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE): a description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation(2002)267 cited
- → Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests(2016)142 cited
- → Ecosystem Carbon Use Efficiency Is Insensitive to Nitrogen Addition in an Alpine Meadow(2018)22 cited
- → Modeling gross primary production and ecosystem respiration in a semiarid grassland of Mongolia(2014)10 cited
- → Modeling of the net ecosystem exchange, gross primary production, and ecosystem respiration for peatland ecosystems of Western Siberia(2018)5 cited