Biomechanical Analysis of Four Types of Internal Fixation in Subtrochanteric Fracture Models
Orthopaedic Surgery2014Vol. 6(2), pp. 128–136
Citations Over TimeTop 15% of 2014 papers
Jie Wang, Xin‐long Ma, Jianxiong Ma, Dan Xing, Yang Yang, Shaowen Zhu, Bao‐yi Ma, Chen Yang, Rui Feng, Haobo Jia, Jingtao Yu
Abstract
Four types of internal fixation achieve better stabilities for type I subtrochanteric fractures. PFN and PFLP produce reliable stability in type IIIA subtrochanteric fractures. If the medial buttress is restored, DCS can be considered. For type IV subtrochanteric fractures, only PFN provides stable fixation. PFLP is suitable for comminuted fractures with large fragments.
Related Papers
- [Comparison of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw for treating intertrochanteric fractures].(2009)
- COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TREATMENT OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE WITH SIMPLE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW AND LOCKING DYNAMIC HIP SCREW IN ELDERLY PATIENTS(2013)
- Clinical study of dynamic hip screw on intertrochanteric fractures(2006)
- → Comparison of MTDHS and DHS in treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric femur fractures(2010)
- → A comparative study of proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in the surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures(2017)