Comparison of oral midazolam with intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication for children undergoing CT imaging: a randomized, double‐blind, and controlled study
Pediatric Anesthesia2016Vol. 27(1), pp. 37–44
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Abstract
In the doses and time intervals used in our study, intranasal dexmedetomidine (2.5 μg·kg-1 ) was found to be superior to oral midazolam (0.5 mg·kg-1 ) for producing satisfactory sedation for CT imaging.
Related Papers
- → Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2014)96 cited
- → Preanesthetic medication in children: A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam(2011)80 cited
- → Comparison the oral premedication of midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and melatonin for children’s sedation and ease of separation from parents before anesthesia(2020)6 cited
- → Does dexmedetomidine premedication have an effect on stress response?(2006)2 cited
- → INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS EFFECTIVE PREMEDICATION IN CHILDREN(2020)