How Politicians’ Reelection Efforts Can Reduce Public Trust, Electoral Support, and Policy Approval
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers
Abstract
Politicians’ desire for reelection motivates them to be responsive to voters’ policy preferences. In the traditional view, voters choose between candidates based on their delivery of favorable outcomes such as ideologically appealing policies or a prospering economy. However, research in psychology shows that, in addition to outcomes, people care about procedural fairness and, particularly, impartial decision‐makers who make decisions without personal motives and interests. This, I argue, confronts politicians with a delicate task: politicians must present voters with favorable policy outcomes but without appearing as if they pursue these policies based on a personal, vote‐maximizing motive for reelection. In four survey experiments, I find support for this argument. Participants were significantly less inclined to trust and vote for politicians and support their policies when political decisions were described as motivated by reelection considerations than when no such motive was present. The findings advance our understanding of how citizens view political representation and have important implications for research on public opinion, legislative behavior, and democratic theory.
Related Papers
- → Can policy-packaging increase public support for costly policies? Insights from a choice experiment on policies against vehicle emissions(2019)95 cited
- → Public Attitude and Opinion Leaders: Mapping Chinese Discussion of EU's Energy Role on Social Media(2022)6 cited
- → Public opinion and alcohol policy in Sweden, 1990–2012(2013)14 cited
- Important Means for Gaining Support from Public Opinion in Developing Non-governmental Higher Education(2007)
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)