The Relation Between Social Identities and Outgroup Hostility Among German Immigrant‐Origin Citizens

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2020 papers

Abstract

One of the major drivers of societal conflict are the intergroup relations which rely mainly on social identity and which are rarely analyzed for immigrant groups. This article changes this point of view by investigating the extent to which national, ethnic, and religious identities relate to outgroup hostilities towards the majority of the German population, towards other immigrant groups, and towards Syrian refugees among immigrant‐origin citizens. We employ a theoretical framework based on the social identity approach and use new representative survey data from 2017 for Germans of Turkish descent ( N = 480) and Russian Germans ( N = 471). Based on multivariate linear regression analysis, we show that ethnic identity has the strongest positive relation with outgroup hostilities, with the exception of the Russian‐Germans' evaluation of the German majority population. National identity among Germans of Turkish descent lessens their hostility towards other immigrants. Our results show the importance of analyzing immigrant groups with different migration trajectories separately before making generalized claims. Not only are the identity relations different between an ingroup identification and various outgroup targets, but they are also different between the immigrant groups for the same ingroup identification and outgroup target.

Related Papers

• → Minimal‐group membership influences children's responses to novel experience with group members(2012)38 cited
• → Who Do We Inform? The Role of Status and Target in Intergroup Whistle-blowing(2009)13 cited
• → Leaving an attacked group: Authoritative criticism decreases ingroup favoritism(2019)7 cited
• → Contexts and conditions of outgroup influence(2023)1 cited
• → Favored outgroup can eliminate the ingroup reference effect(2021)