Is alveolar ridge preservation an overtreatment?
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2023 papers
Abstract
The morphology and dimensions of the postextraction alveolar ridge are important for the surgical and restorative phases of implant treatment. Adequate new bone formation and preservation of alveolar ridge dimensions following extraction will facilitate installation of the implant in a restorative position, while preservation of soft tissue contour and volume is essential for an aesthetic and implant-supported restoration with healthy peri-implant tissues. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) refers to any procedure that aims to: (i) limit dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge after extraction facilitating implant placement without additional extensive bone and soft tissue augmentation procedures (ii) promote new bone formation in the healing alveolus, and (iii) promote soft tissue healing at the entrance of the alveolus and preserve the alveolar ridge contour. Although ARP is a clinically validated and safe approach, in certain clinical scenarios, the additional clinical benefit of ARP over unassisted socket healing has been debated and it appears that for some clinicians may represent an overtreatment. The aim of this critical review was to discuss the evidence pertaining to the four key objectives of ARP and to determine where ARP can lead to favorable outcomes when compared to unassisted socket healing.
Related Papers
- → Discrete element simulation of the resistance of a ship in unconsolidated ridges(2019)27 cited
- Comparison Study on Soil and Water Loss of Cross Ridge and Longitudinal Ridge(2005)
- Effects of Different Ridge and Planting Distances on the Yield of Eshu No.9(2015)
- → Studies on the Hot-water Heating of Ridge. II(1976)