An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2017 papers
Abstract
This article proposes a modified cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for estimating the human error probability in the maritime accident process on the basis of an evidential reasoning approach. This modified CREAM is developed to precisely quantify the linguistic variables of the common performance conditions and to overcome the problem of ignoring the uncertainty caused by incomplete information in the existing CREAM models. Moreover, this article views maritime accident development from the sequential perspective, where a scenario- and barrier-based framework is proposed to describe the maritime accident process. This evidential reasoning-based CREAM approach together with the proposed accident development framework are applied to human reliability analysis of a ship capsizing accident. It will facilitate subjective human reliability analysis in different engineering systems where uncertainty exists in practice.
Related Papers
- → How can the Petroleum Industry Benefit from Human Reliability Analysis?(2014)4 cited
- → THE DEVELOPMENT OF A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS METHOD TO SUPPLEMENT THE ANALYSIS OF OPERATOR'S HUMAN ERRORS IN MCR OF NPPS(2007)
- Human factors issues in qualitative and quantitative safety analyses(1993)
- Development of Human Error Probability Program for Human Error Analysis of Chemical Plants(2002)
- → In-depth Analysis of the Conveyor Stuck Accident Using a Set of Accident Analysis Tools(2020)