A Probabilistic Formalisation of Contextual Bias: from Forensic Analysis to Systemic Bias in the Criminal Justice System
Citations Over TimeTop 24% of 2022 papers
Abstract
Abstract Researchers have found evidence of contextual bias in forensic science, but the discussion of contextual bias is currently qualitative. We formalise existing empirical research and show quantitatively how biases can be propagated throughout the legal system, all the way up to the final determination of guilt in a criminal trial. We provide a probabilistic framework for describing how information is updated in a forensic analysis setting by using the ratio form of Bayes’ rule. We analyse results from empirical studies using this framework and employ simulations to demonstrate how bias can be compounded where experiments do not exist. We find that even minor biases in the earlier stages of forensic analysis can lead to large, compounded biases in the final determination of guilt in a criminal trial.
Related Papers
- → Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study(2014)435 cited
- → Systematic Analysis of Publication Bias in Neurosurgery Meta-Analyses(2022)15 cited
- → Meta-Analyses with Binary Outcomes: How Many Studies Need to be Omitted to Detect a Publication Bias?(2008)9 cited
- → Adli Bilimlerde Adli Tıp ve Adli Tıp Dışı Alanların Turkiye’deki Yapılanması ile ilgili Sorunlar: İki Rapor ile Değerlendirme(2022)3 cited
- → Some words in support of the Forensic Science Society Diploma in Forensic Document Examination(2000)1 cited