The Sceptical Bayes Factor for the Assessment of Replication Success

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2022 papers

Abstract

Abstract Replication studies are increasingly conducted but there is no established statistical criterion for replication success. We propose a novel approach combining reverse-Bayes analysis with Bayesian hypothesis testing: a sceptical prior is determined for the effect size such that the original finding is no longer convincing in terms of a Bayes factor. This prior is then contrasted to an advocacy prior (the reference posterior of the effect size based on the original study), and replication success is declared if the replication data favour the advocacy over the sceptical prior at a higher level than the original data favoured the sceptical prior over the null hypothesis. The sceptical Bayes factor is the highest level where replication success can be declared. A comparison to existing methods reveals that the sceptical Bayes factor combines several notions of replicability: it ensures that both studies show sufficient evidence against the null and penalises incompatibility of their effect estimates. Analysis of asymptotic properties and error rates, as well as case studies from the Social Sciences Replication Project show the advantages of the method for the assessment of replicability.

Related Papers

• → The null hypothesis is always rejected with statistical tricks: Why do you need it?(2019)4 cited
• → Null hypothesis testing explained(2022)1 cited
• → Controlling Familywise Error When Rejecting at Most One Null Hypothesis Each From a Sequence of Sub-Families of Null Hypotheses(2017)
• → The debate over null hypothesis testing and wise use as the solution(2022)
• → Common misconceptions(2022)