Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2016 papers
Abstract
Land use and related pressures have reduced local terrestrial biodiversity, but it is unclear how the magnitude of change relates to the recently proposed planetary boundary ("safe limit"). We estimate that land use and related pressures have already reduced local biodiversity intactness--the average proportion of natural biodiversity remaining in local ecosystems--beyond its recently proposed planetary boundary across 58.1% of the world's land surface, where 71.4% of the human population live. Biodiversity intactness within most biomes (especially grassland biomes), most biodiversity hotspots, and even some wilderness areas is inferred to be beyond the boundary. Such widespread transgression of safe limits suggests that biodiversity loss, if unchecked, will undermine efforts toward long-term sustainable development.
Related Papers
- → Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: A review(2009)320 cited
- → Landscape response functions for biodiversity—assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level(2003)86 cited
- GHG Mitigation Potentials and Costs from Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) in Annex 1 Countries(2008)
- Mitigating Against Climate Change in Scotland: Identification and Initial Assessment of Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) Policy Options(2008)
- Annex I countries and land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF).(2009)