Diagnosing dying: an integrative literature review
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care2014Vol. 4(3), pp. 263–270
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2014 papers
Catriona Kennedy, Patricia Brooks-Young, Carol Gray Brunton, Philip Larkin, Michael Connolly, Bodil Wilde‐Larsson, Maria Larsson, Tracy Smith, Susie Chater
Abstract
The findings of this review support the explicit recognition of 'uncertainty in diagnosing dying' and the need to work with and within this concept. Clinical decision making needs to allow for recovery where that potential exists, but equally there is the need to avoid futile interventions.
Related Papers
- → Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review(2009)275 cited
- → The Relationship Between Adult Attachment and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review(2019)63 cited
- → An integrative review of supportive relationships between child‐bearing women and midwives(2022)35 cited
- → Locating qualitative studies in dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO: A comparison of search strategies(2017)23 cited
- → A validation study revealed differences in design and performance of search filters for qualitative research in PsycINFO and CINAHL(2020)12 cited