Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems.
Journal of Clinical Pathology1996Vol. 49(10), pp. 833–835
Citations Over TimeTop 14% of 1996 papers
W. Glenn McCluggage, H. Bharucha, Linda Caughley, Anand Date, Peter W. Hamilton, Claire Thornton, M. Walsh
Abstract
Interobserver agreement in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens using the CIN grading system is poor. Agreement, while still poor, is better when a modified Bethesda grading system is used. There is little or no consensus in the diagnosis of BAUS.
Related Papers
- → The subtle facial signs of prenatal exposure to alcohol: An anthropometric approach(2001)60 cited
- Craniofacial anthropometric analysis in Down's syndrome patients.(2003)
- Craniofacial morphology in parents of cleft children and healthy individuals.(2006)
- → Craniofacial Tissue Engineering(2017)62 cited