Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach: Table 1

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2005 papers

Abstract

Lifestyle diseases constitute an increasing proportion of health problems and this trend is likely to continue. A better understanding of the responsibility argument is important for the assessment of policies aimed at meeting this challenge. Holding individuals accountable for their choices in the context of health care is, however, controversial. There are powerful arguments both for and against such policies. In this article the main arguments for and the traditional arguments against the use of individual responsibility as a criterion for the distribution of scarce health resources will be briefly outlined. It is argued that one of the most prominent contemporary normative traditions, liberal egalitarianism, presents a way of holding individuals accountable for their choices that avoids most of the problems pointed out by the critics. The aim of the article is to propose a plausible interpretation of liberal egalitarianism with respect to responsibility and health care and assess it against reasonable counter-arguments.

Related Papers

• → Normative Rational Choice Theory: Past, Present, and Future(2012)7 cited
• → The normative foundations of ‘policy implications’: reflections on international labour migration(2010)8 cited
• → Normative rational choice theory: Past, present, and future(2015)4 cited
• → Equality of when?(2017)1 cited
• → Recent Thought On Egalitarianism(1957)7 cited