Does eel metamorphosis cause a breakdown in the tenets of otolith applications? A case study using the speckled worm eel (Myrophis punctatus, Ophichthidae)
Citations Over TimeTop 17% of 2006 papers
Abstract
Several basic tenets of otolith research have been questioned recently with regard to eel metamorphosis. Specifically, some researchers have suggested that otolith increment formation is not daily, and otolith material may be resorped during metamorphosis. We conducted a rearing experiment to test the hypothesis that increment formation is daily and that the otolith continues to grow during eel metamorphosis. We marked the otoliths of wild-caught Myrophis punctatus leptocephali and reared these fish through metamorphosis. Metamorphosis was characterized by a decreasing standard length, pre-anal length, and body depth accompanied by an increase in pigmentation and a change in behavior. Increment formation was daily or near-daily through metamorphosis, and the otolith continued to grow during metamorphosis. Thus, the basic tenets of otolith application apply to eel metamorphosis, and non-daily ring deposition and resorption should not be used as explanations for otolith characteristics of eels (e.g., back-calculated hatch dates) unless demonstrated experimentally.
Related Papers
- → Effects of larval diet and metamorphosis cue on survival and growth of sea urchin post-larvae ( Paracentrotus lividus ; Lamarck, 1816)(2016)38 cited
- → The onset of metamorphosis in Tenebrio molitor larvae (Insecta, Coleoptera) under grouped, isolated and starved conditions(1991)44 cited
- → The Structure and Metamorphosis of the Larva of Spongilla lacustris(1899)18 cited
- → Larval development following juvenile hormone analogue treatment of eggs of the lesser milkweed bug, Lygaeus kalmii(1973)12 cited
- Induction of settlement and metamorphosis of Saccostrea cucullata larvae.(2000)