Sources of evidence for vertical selection
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2009 papers
Abstract
Web search providers often include search services for domain-specific subcollections, called verticals, such as news, images, videos, job postings, company summaries, and artist profiles. We address the problem of vertical selection, predicting relevant verticals (if any) for queries issued to the search engine's main web search page. In contrast to prior query classification and resource selection tasks, vertical selection is associated with unique resources that can inform the classification decision. We focus on three sources of evidence: (1) the query string, from which features are derived independent of external resources, (2) logs of queries previously issued directly to the vertical, and (3) corpora representative of vertical content. We focus on 18 different verticals, which differ in terms of semantics, media type, size, and level of query traffic. We compare our method to prior work in federated search and retrieval effectiveness prediction. An in-depth error analysis reveals unique challenges across different verticals and provides insight into vertical selection for future work.
Related Papers
- → Focus interpretation in Thetic statements: Alternative Semantics and Optimality Theory Pragmatics(2006)49 cited
- → Unalternative Semantics(2016)16 cited
- LTAG Semantics of Focus(2004)
- → Behavior of Search Engines in Popular Queries(2016)1 cited
- Focus Interpretation in Thetic Statements: Alternative Semantics and OT Pragmatics(2005)