An analysis of binarization ground truthing
2010pp. 27–34
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2010 papers
Abstract
The accuracy of a binarization algorithm is often calculated relative to a ground truth image. Except for synthetically generated images, no ground truth image exists. Evaluating binarization on real images is preferred. The ground truthing between and among different operators is compared. Four direct metrics were used. The variability of the results of five different automatic binarization algorithms were compared to that of manual ground truth results. Significant variability in the ground truth results was found.
Related Papers
- → Markerless 3D Human Pose Estimation and Tracking based on RGBD Cameras(2017)29 cited
- → Robust Object Segmentation Using Graph Cut with Object and Background Seed Estimation(2006)12 cited
- → ESKO6d - A Binocular and RGB-D Dataset of Stored Kitchen Objects with 6d Poses(2019)1 cited
- → Video with Ground-Truth for Validation of Visual Registration, Tracking and Navigation Algorithms(2005)3 cited
- → Disparity Image Inpainting with Improved Method Based on Exemplar(2011)