Tweeting is believing?

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2012 papers

Abstract

Twitter is now used to distribute substantive content such as breaking news, increasing the importance of assessing the credibility of tweets. As users increasingly access tweets through search, they have less information on which to base credibility judgments as compared to consuming content from direct social network connections. We present survey results regarding users' perceptions of tweet credibility. We find a disparity between features users consider relevant to credibility assessment and those currently revealed by search engines. We then conducted two experiments in which we systematically manipulated several features of tweets to assess their impact on credibility ratings. We show that users are poor judges of truthfulness based on content alone, and instead are influenced by heuristics such as user name when making credibility assessments. Based on these findings, we discuss strategies tweet authors can use to enhance their credibility with readers (and strategies astute readers should be aware of!). We propose design improvements for displaying social search results so as to better convey credibility.

Related Papers

• → The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence(2004)2,115 cited
• → When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion(2005)268 cited
• → The Effects of Source Credibility and Message Variation on Mail Survey Response Behaviour(2012)5 cited
• → Effects of Source and Message Credibility on Writing Style(1966)5 cited
• → Credibility-based Fake News Detection(2019)