Evaluating the Usability of Automatically Generated Captions for People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2017 papers

Abstract

The accuracy of Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) technology has improved, but it is still imperfect in many settings. Researchers who evaluate ASR performance often focus on improving the Word Error Rate (WER) metric, but WER has been found to have little correlation with human-subject performance on many applications. We propose a new captioning-focused evaluation metric that better predicts the impact of ASR recognition errors on the usability of automatically generated captions for people who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (DHH). Through a user study with 30 DHH users, we compared our new metric with the traditional WER metric on a caption usability evaluation task. In a side-by-side comparison of pairs of ASR text output (with identical WER), the texts preferred by our new metric were preferred by DHH participants. Further, our metric had significantly higher correlation with DHH participants' subjective scores on the usability of a caption, as compared to the correlation between WER metric and participant subjective scores. This new metric could be used to select ASR systems for captioning applications, and it may be a better metric for ASR researchers to consider when optimizing ASR systems.

Related Papers

• → OSCAR and ActivityNet: an Image Captioning model can effectively learn a Video Captioning dataset(2021)1 cited
• → Video Captioning via Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning(2017)22 cited
• → Boosted Attention: Leveraging Human Attention for Image Captioning(2019)1 cited
• → Image Captioning Methodologies Using Deep Learning: A Review(2020)
• → Image Captioning using Neural Networks(2022)