Few-shot Text-to-SQL Translation using Structure and Content Prompt Learning

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2023 papers

Abstract

A common problem with adopting Text-to-SQL translation in database systems is poor generalization. Specifically, when there is limited training data on new datasets, existing few-shot Text-to-SQL techniques, even with carefully designed textual prompts on pre-trained language models (PLMs), tend to be ineffective. In this paper, we present a divide-and-conquer framework to better support few-shot Text-to-SQL translation, which divides Text-to-SQL translation into two stages (or sub-tasks), such that each sub-task is simpler to be tackled. The first stage, called the structure stage, steers a PLM to generate an SQL structure (including SQL commands such as SELECT, FROM, WHERE and SQL operators such as <", ?>") with placeholders for missing identifiers. The second stage, called the content stage, guides a PLM to populate the placeholders in the generated SQL structure with concrete values (including SQL identifies such as table names, column names, and constant values). We propose a hybrid prompt strategy that combines learnable vectors and fixed vectors (i.e., word embeddings of textual prompts), such that the hybrid prompt can learn contextual information to better guide PLMs for prediction in both stages. In addition, we design keyword constrained decoding to ensure the validity of generated SQL structures, and structure guided decoding to guarantee the model to fill correct content. Extensive experiments, by comparing with ten state-of-the-art Text-to-SQL solutions at the time of writing, show that SC-Prompt significantly outperforms them in the few-shot scenario. In particular, on the widely-adopted Spider dataset, given less than 500 labeled training examples (5% of the official training set), SC-Prompt outperforms the previous SOTA methods by around 5% on accuracy.

Related Papers

• Learning SQL(2005)
• → A Survey of SQL Language(1993)5 cited
• → Semi-automatic assessment of basic SQL statements(2019)5 cited
• → SQL+i: Adding temporal indeterminacy to the database language SQL(1996)4 cited
• Interactive Sql on the As/400(1995)