0 citations
Comparison of Implantation Accuracy Among Different Navigated Approaches: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants2023Vol. 39(3), pp. 455–467
Citations Over TimeTop 15% of 2023 papers
Abstract
According to the present results, the accuracies for DN, FG, and PG were higher than those for FH. DN showed the highest accuracy in terms of apical deviation and angular deviation. FG had the best control over the coronal deviation. There was no statistical difference between DN and FG in terms of accuracy. Given the limitations of the current study, further validation is required.
Related Papers
- → In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias(2005)494 cited
- → The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing “Publication Bias” in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods(2023)125 cited
- → Helicobacter pylori infection and pancreatic cancer risk: A meta-analysis(2016)58 cited
- → Meta-Analyses with Binary Outcomes: How Many Studies Need to be Omitted to Detect a Publication Bias?(2008)9 cited
- → Statistische Methoden zur Detektion und Adjustierung von Publikationsbias(2010)6 cited