Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Types of Lasers for the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers

Abstract

Although lasers have shown promising results in reducing clinical signs of peri-implantitis, because of the limited sample sizes and short follow-up periods, no firm conclusion can be drawn at this moment. Hence, there is a need for more well-designed, longitudinal, randomized controlled clinical trials.

Related Papers

• → Does residual cement around implant‐supported restorations cause peri‐implant disease? A retrospective case analysis(2012)299 cited
• → Evaluation of Different Implant Designs in a Ligature-Induced Peri-implantitis Model: A Canine Study(2015)14 cited
• → Maintenance therapy in patients following the surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: a 5‐year follow‐up study(2014)82 cited
• → Evaluation of 0.2% delmopinol mouth rinse for prevention of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis: A randomized controlled canine study(2018)8 cited
• Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis : commentary : review(2012)