Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants2017Vol. 33(1), pp. 101–115
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2017 papers
Fernando Bover-Ramos, José Viña‐Almunia, Juan Cervera-Ballester, Miguel Peñarrocha Diago, Berta García-Mira
Abstract
Implant placement accuracy was lower in clinical and cadaver studies compared with in vitro studies, especially in terms of horizontal apical deviation and angular deviation. Full-guided implant surgery achieved greater accuracy than half-guided surgery.
Related Papers
- → Fracture morphology of AO/OTA 31-A trochanteric fractures: A 3D CT study with an emphasis on coronal fragments(2016)49 cited
- → Three-dimensional fracture mapping and analysis of coronal fractures in AO/OTA types 33-B3 and C3(2022)4 cited
- Coronal MPR of 64-slice spiral CT in investigation of the cause of bowel obstruction(2009)
- Evaluation of Coronal CT Scanning in Observing Vestibular Aqueduct(2004)
- A preliminary study on treatment of coronal fractures with hydrocylapatite(2001)