Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions2018Vol. 11(6), pp. e006368–e006368
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2018 papers
Stéphane Fournier, Gábor G. Tóth, Bernard De Bruyne, Nils P. Johnson, Giovanni Ciccarelli, Panagiotis Xaplanteris, Anastasios Milkas, Teresa Strisciuglio, Jozef Bartúnek, Marc Vanderheyden, Eric Wyffels, Filip Casselman, Frank Van Praet, Bernard Stockman, Ivan Degrieck, Emanuele Barbato
Abstract
FFR-guided CABG is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of overall death or myocardial infarction at 6-year follow-up as compared with angiography-guided CABG.
Related Papers
- → Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve in the assessment of coronary artery stenoses(2012)31 cited
- → Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve(2015)15 cited
- → Cost-effectiveness of PCI guided by fractional flow reserve(2011)4 cited
- → Contrast Fractional Flow Reserve (cFFR) and Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)(2020)2 cited
- Research progresses of coronary fractional flow reserve(2013)